Description of Chernobyl today was `too comforting' Chernobyl article painted a misleadingly rosy picture
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.RICHARD NORTH'S article on the aftermath in Russia of the Chernobyl accident ("Living with catastrophe", Sunday Review, 10 December) strikes me as being rather more comforting than past and present health statistics indicate.
It failed to mention an increase in Belarus of cataract, heart disease, hyperactive thyroid and mental retardation - the last being considered due to pre-natal exposure to radiation and also observed at Hiroshima. Further, in the 10-30-year period after its bombing, the surviving Hiroshima population also suffered increases in breast, lung, gastric and colon cancers, together with multiple myeloma.
A F M Burdett
Butleigh, Somerset
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments