David Bowie: Should there be a permanent memorial for the rock legend?
Of course, the awkward question then arises as to which Bowie should be commemorated
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One day, a memorial for David Bowie might look a little silly, as if the country in the year 2016 had undergone a massive overreaction to the death of a man who, while popular at the time, might from some vantage point on the future, look hopelessly outdated, obscure even. Such is the fate of many a statue.
Indeed, the row over the one of Cecil Rhodes at the University of Oxford proves how radically the climate of opinion can change over the lifespan of a lump of bronze. Every town square in Britain has a statue or two of someone now utterly obscure, even if they were a big player in the Peninsular War or the birth of the industrial revolution.
No matter. They were, in that great journalistic phrase, “right at the time”, and much the same may be said of the late Bowie. By any standard we have at our disposal today, his work has stood the test of time, and there is no necessary reason to believe it will not in the future, and, after all, his first celebrated albums are already four decades old. The past few days have shown how beloved he was of the public, and how globally significant he was too.
Of course, the awkward question then arises as to which Bowie should be commemorated – the glam rock one, the thin white Duke, the pierrot, or the one with bandages around his head. It would, therefore, be fitting for the statue to be chosen by the public, and for it, just like those ones of long forgotten equestrian figured imperial generals, to be paid for “by public subscription”. It should certainly, though, be in Beckenham, which needs the cachet rather more than trendy Brixton in London.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments