Tim Allan: Spin doctors are not as sinister, or as effective, as people think

From a speech by Tony Blair's former press secretary to the Labour History Group in the House of Lords

Friday 16 May 2003 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Clare Short told us this week that in our first term the problem was spin, endless announcements, exaggerations and media manipulation that undermined people's respect for the Government and trust in what we said. As someone described by her as a creature that lived in the dark, I want to give my perspective on how true that characterisation is.

The role of spin has been vastly exaggerated both by the party's supporters and its critics. To borrow Neil Kinnock's characterisation of Peter Mandelson, Labour spin doctors were not nearly as sinister as people thought they were, and not nearly effective as they thought they were.

What did we get right? We faced a largely hostile press up to 1992-94. Much of the Labour Party saw newspaper proprietors' hostility to the party as the root of the problem rather than a symptom of it. Tony Blair was baffled by the party's hostility towards the press, and was assiduous in making sure he got to know columnists, editors and proprietors well before he became leader. He thought there was a historic opportunity to capitalise on disaffection with the Tories and to win parts of the press round.

In opposition, strategy was twofold. There was a relentless effort to communicate change through the pages of the Mail, the Telegraph, and The Sun, backed by much tougher monitoring and rebuttal of inaccuracies, especially if mistakes were made by broadcasters.

What did we get wrong in government? In opposition we had become lightening fast in our response. But we had no experience of government press work and the different techniques that are needed. In government, such haste got us into trouble. When we moved fast to denounce the bonuses paid to Camelot directors, we did so before the policy implications of this strategy had been thought about.

So where do we stand now, six years into a Labour government? Spin is much less of an issue for a number of reasons. The Government has made an active effort to mend its ways. There are fewer selective briefings, more considered responses, fewer relaunches, much more direct communication from the PM, and acceptance that policies are what matters over the long term.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in