The Third Leader: Revenge of the rewrite

Charles Nevin
Tuesday 17 May 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Back not forward. The force, judging by Revenge of the Sith, the latest Star Wars instalment, is definitely more to do with beginnings than boldly going. There are those, of course, who suggest that this third prequel in the saga is not so much about artistic direction as maximising returns on a very successful franchise. But down here in The Third Leader Department, we are not at home to that sort of cynicism.

Back not forward. The force, judging by Revenge of the Sith, the latest Star Wars instalment, is definitely more to do with beginnings than boldly going. There are those, of course, who suggest that this third prequel in the saga is not so much about artistic direction as maximising returns on a very successful franchise. But down here in The Third Leader Department, we are not at home to that sort of cynicism.

No, down here, we look at the popularity of the prequel as a form, and wonder whether it reflects a prevailing force in the thoughts and doings of humanity: a lack of confidence in the present and the future so severe that it expresses itself not just in a desire to return to the past, but to the past of the past.

Deep stuff, but worry not, as it doesn't really stand up. For a start, "prequel" may be a recent coining, but Virgil was at it in the Eclogues, as was Wagner with Das Rheingold and Siegfried. C S Lewis did it, and Tolkien may have just done it with The Silmarillion. Sterne even managed it inside the same book.

The urge to return is as old as Eden. It is, the experts will tell you, to do with emerging from the sea, the womb, and all that. The appeal of the prequel is that it manages to combine this with another strong impulse of ours, to invent and reinvent the past, as evidenced by all our great writers and Jeffrey Archer.

Its opponents, we feel, are the humourless ones - with far too strong an attachment to order - and you know how much trouble they've caused, just on this planet.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in