The Third Leader: Nanny state

Charles Nevin
Wednesday 22 November 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Significant times, these, for the influence on Britain of Dame Julie Andrews. First, Lord Lloyd Webber's knock-'em-dead revival of The Sound of Music follows Mary Poppins into the West End; then, at Westminster, the Prime Minister joins in, too, transforming us, as if by magic, from a Nanny state to a Supernanny state.

We do try to be sympathetic - and to keep up - as initiative follows initiative in pursuance of the Government's policy of being seen to be doing something about everything; nevertheless, it's difficult to avoid the conclusion that Ms Poppins, and any other Supernanny worth her umbrella and sensible shoes, would frown on such overexcited behaviour and order a period of quiet lying down in a darkened room before tea.

Ms Poppins and her 77 colleagues might also tut-tut about the dangers of watching too much television, as that's where Mr Blair seems to have got his idea from. Not long to go, then, before the introduction of compulsory ballroom dancing and a solution to prison overcrowding involving close incarceration in jungle conditions with questionable companions.

No one would question the severity of our social problems, but surely the answer, as Nanny would doubtless herself propose, is a stitch in time and an increased concentration on the simple, old-fashioned dosage so enthusiastically prescribed earlier: education, education, education.

Not that nannying, or even supernannying, is necessarily a bad idea, in the right place, at the right time. Clearly, a soothing, experienced figure, ever ready with sensible advice, would do this Government a power of good. Dame Julie?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in