The Third Leader: Author! Author!

Charles Nevin
Wednesday 22 March 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Flutterings and mutterings, I see, over the decision of the editor of the BBC magazine, Focus, to devote a dozen pages to a book he has written. There is a feeling that this might not necessarily accord with what the editor, a Mr Parsons, describes as "Focus's scientifically critical eye".

Well. I am disinclined by temperament to criticise editors; even so, there are persuasive pleas in Mr Parsons' defence. He shows, for instance, an enviable freedom from the false modesty that bedevils so many of us. The chief marks of a mature society, as is apparent in several other current contexts, include openness and honesty. And there are some distinguished precedents for an unabashed eagerness to promote one's own product. The great German diva Elisabeth Schwarzkopf chose recordings only of herself on Desert Island Discs, a decision that, for some reason, has been mocked mercilessly ever since.

Writers have form, too. Dickens didn't exactly hold back as a magazine editor. Walter Scott compared himself to Shakespeare in his own magazine. But that was surely preferable to Anthony Burgess's failure to mention that the author he was reviewing was his pseudonymous self (although, as Gore Vidal remarked, "he is the first novelist in England to know that a reviewer has actually read the book under review").

You will still, perhaps, be worried about a conflict of interest. But remember we have recently been advised not to take too suspicious a view on this. In this spirit, it would be ridiculous to suggest my views have been influenced by the forthcoming paperback publication of my own fantastic book.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in