Stephen Bayley: 'Once a masterpiece, now a Sodom of commercialism'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Regent Street is the best and worst of modern London. Unfortunately, the best parts are the ones located in the past. The plan, published in 1812, was "unique in the history of town-planning", the great architectural historian Sir John Summerson said. It was an entirely modern concept: a mixture of civic formality and picturesque composition. It was brave: Regent Street was inspired by art but driven by money. The result, executed with confidence and style, was innovative, disciplined, beautiful and useful: a masterpiece of cityscape. Since John Nash, other forces have had their melancholy influence. What is left of Regent Street is trapped between adulation of the past (perhaps not such a bad thing) and short-sighted money-grubbing by landlords whose measure of value and utility is rental income alone. No amount of iPod emporia can save Regent Street from what it has become: a Sodom of the crassest commercialism. Nash was no stranger to finance, but he had other ambitions, and he created a wonderful pa
Regent Street is the best and worst of modern London. Unfortunately, the best parts are the ones located in the past. The plan, published in 1812, was "unique in the history of town-planning", the great architectural historian Sir John Summerson said. It was an entirely modern concept: a mixture of civic formality and picturesque composition. It was brave: Regent Street was inspired by art but driven by money. The result, executed with confidence and style, was innovative, disciplined, beautiful and useful: a masterpiece of cityscape. Since John Nash, other forces have had their melancholy influence. What is left of Regent Street is trapped between adulation of the past (perhaps not such a bad thing) and short-sighted money-grubbing by landlords whose measure of value and utility is rental income alone. No amount of iPod emporia can save Regent Street from what it has become: a Sodom of the crassest commercialism. Nash was no stranger to finance, but he had other ambitions, and he created a wonderful part of London. The failure of modern Regent Street is easily described : Londoners do not go there. It is a nasty shopping street for bemused out-of-towners and tourists.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments