The Sketch: Why the Speaker might like to rechristen the shadow Treasury team
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Chancellor had finished some rhetorical answer at Treasury questions with the words "deficit reduction programme" and the Speaker said with a nonchalant certainty: "Balls!"
What he needs to ventilate his feelings fully is a shadow Treasury team rechristened in a specific faith. So, after Michael Fallon urged from the front bench: "The independent OBR predicts 1m more in employment by 2014", the Speaker could call out: "Cack!"
Andrew Tyrie, the chair of the Treasury committee, pointed out the difficulty of strengthening bank balance sheets while maintaining lending and then asked shareholders to insist profits be reinvested rather than distributed in bonuses...and the Speaker could shout: "Cobblers!"
The Chancellor said that international aid will rise from £8.5bn to £12bn "and if we attack that then the coalition supporting it will fall apart," and the Speaker could bark: "Watt-Bollocks!"
Yes, yes, never mind that. Looking beneath the highly educated, massively informed, statistically opulent arguments – the debate comes down to something as simple as that.
The left say we mustn't depress demand by cutting spending. The right say we mustn't depress demand by high interest rates. Either might be correct – either has been correct from time to time, and each side can confidently abuse the other. No doubt it will all sort itself out. In the meantime there is the debate to pass the time.
Ed Balls gave Rachel Reeves (that Tory favourite) his two main questions. What is he up to? Cynics speculate he was trying to ingratiate himself with Labour's sisterhood in order to give substance to his Homme Nouvel branding and to prepare the ground for his wife's leadership bid.
Some additional evidence for that cropped up in the later economic debate. Remember that euro membership is still Labour policy. Remember too that Ed Miliband has said he sort-of favours joining it "depending how long I'm Prime Minister for". So his Chancellor surprised the chamber – no less than his leader – by saying "No British government will join the euro in my lifetime."
Ed Miliband might kill him of course, but it is certainly fair to say that Ed Balls more than anyone was responsible for keeping Britain out of the euro. That is quite an abrupt – and public – assertion of eurosceptic economics over his master's europhile politics.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments