The Sketch: The Chancellor had little in the way of satisfactory answers to any questions

What we will publish is 12 fuel-duty rises and the date that we won't be doing another one!

Simon Carr
Tuesday 26 June 2012 23:16 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Labour Q: Why is the economy in recession two years after we were just coming out?

Coalition A: Because WE'RE not putting up fuel duty like YOU were going to do! (Wild Tory cheering. A junior MP faints when the Chancellor looks at him. A fat man bursts.)

An announcement had been made to the House of Commons, in the way people always say they want. Labour felt sick at the good news and Chris Leslie shoved his elbow in Cathy Jamieson's face in order to pat the shoulder of his boss Ed Balls. It was his way of showing that Labour had: a) been right all along and b) no manners.

It was a very useful for George Osborne's reputation. And very useful for ministers who now have a fallback for any question.

Why is HMRC taking so long to answer its phone? Because YOU put up fuel duty 12 times! (Shame! Shame!)

Will the Government publish a list of millionaires who are avoiding tax with outlandish schemes? "What we will publish is 12 fuel-duty rises and the date that we won't be doing another one! Answer, answer? You ask about tax, the answer is FUEL DUTY!"

There was an impenetrable exchange between Natascha Engel and the Chancellor on quantitative easing. She wanted to know how much of this digital money that had been given to the banks had been used to pay back the real money the Government had used to bail them out. I only just understood the question. The answer would have been FUEL DUTY but they hadn't come to it on the Order Paper.

Her other question was about QE maybe being just a way of paying off bank debt with figures on a screen. Did anyone know how that would play out? It called into question the nature of money, and does it really exist? In my case, not really. That's not a very satisfactory answer. But the Chancellor's was no better.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in