The Sketch: If the Foreign Secretary's fighting with words like this, we're in trouble

Simon Carr
Wednesday 27 April 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

We mustn't laugh but – to paraphrase the Foreign Secretary – you have to laugh.

It's impossible to fulfil the UN resolution with Gaddafi in place, William Hague said, and we can't target him, but we can target him. We can't arm the rebels but our partners can arm the rebels and we can arm the rebels. As our mission creeps there will be no mission creep. It's not a stalemate because it's fluid in the sense of being static.

You could just about see what he was getting at, but then he said: "If it goes well it will be the greatest advance in human freedom since the fall of the Berlin Wall." That didn't mean anything at all. Those East Germans were still Germans, remember. This lot have their roots in desert tribalism and may still be animated by issues alive during the Punic Wars, so Sir Peter Tapsell said.

Hague used a 1930s Pathe News voice, a strong, confident I'm-on-top-of-the-job-I-love voice to stop the rumours. But soon, between "a legitimate interlocutor" and "dialogue is the way to resolve every problem in Bahrain" – my notes record the phrase "what a ****ing **** of old ****".

They're in a rotten predicament now – if they stand aside Gaddafi will kill everyone. If they abide by the stalemate, they run out of support. If they kill the brute they set a dangerous precedent. One that puts all western leaders in the firing line.

At Waterloo, when the Duke of Wellington was told they had Napoleon in range, he told them not to be so damned silly. It was not the job of generals to take pot shots at each other, he said.

Right or wrong, that's the precedent, and dumb allegiance to tradition is a very profound Tory virtue. Earlier Alistair Burt came to the Commons to answer an urgent question with the useful phrases, I don't know. No idea. Search me. Some wag was whistling the theme tune to The Great Escape. Nearly 500 Taliban terrorists/freedom fighters had tunnelled their way out of a maximum security jail in Afghanistan.

Who had escaped, what were their names? Um... Burt has an aimiable way of starting his confessions. "Record keeping is such that we don't know," he said.

Julian Lewis asked something which sounded funny until you realised it might be true. Maybe they hadn't tunnelled out: maybe others had tunnelled in. And then used their keys to go from cell to cell assembling 476 of the most dangerous gunmen in the country and dancing them to freedom.

"Clearly the solution is to pass the responsibility for security over to the Afghan people," Burt said. Blimey, if that's the solution, what's the problem again?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in