The Sketch: Frankly, it's Field who has solution to Gordon's woes

Simon Carr
Tuesday 29 April 2008 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Is it cynical to think this is sensible? Or sensible to think it cynical? It's probably cynical to think it cynical but then it's the way they do things round here.

Frank Field's famous amendment about the 10p tax band related to Clause 3. If the Finance Bill was considered in its natural sequence, then, Field would be debated at 3.30 – in time for the newspaper deadlines. So, the whips (that is, Geoff Hoon) organised the scrutiny to begin with Clauses 5, 6 and 21 (then returning to Field about 10.30pm, and finishing who knows when?

Gordon wants to publish his voter-friendly arrangements in time for the local elections on Thursday – but he doesn't want anyone to know he's changed his mind. His understanding of Third Way theory needs more work.

But if Gordon has "got it" and defused the row, this sort of tricksiness wouldn't be necessary. If there were a happy story to tell, they'd want it out in time for the Six O'Clock News. They must be terrified of the Field's questions: 1) How many losers are there (not counting the PM)? And 2) will all compensation be backdated? Those are the questions that Yvette Cooper failed, at great length, to answer on Newsnight.

There's some energy in the rebellion yet, I feel.

Gordon flings his throwing sticks out, hoping to bring down some great prey. But they're boomerangs. They return – sometimes after years (Grangemouth is caused by his £5bn a year pension tax) – and whack him right where it hurts, in the back of his head. Boomerang Brown. Dong! "Och! McBlast! Who threw that! They shall be punished!" Only too true.

But here's an interesting exception. The fact that Brown caused Frank Field to be sacked all those years ago – I don't think that was one of the boomerangs. In all my conversations with Field over the years I've never managed to extract any personal venom from him about Brown. Christians can be annoying like that.

Frank's other admirable contribution to Labour thinking may yet bear fruit (the Tories should nick it). Abolish the vast, impenetrable apparatus of tax credits and use the money to take 5p off the basic rate of tax. It would give Labour a fourth term in a way nothing else could ... But then they are looking forward to "refreshing themselves with a period of opposition".

simoncarr@sketch.sc

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in