The Sketch: EU treaties lead us all to delusions of confusions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I know you don't find the Eurobabble as funny as I do, but when we propose the transposition of measures from Pillar 3 (at the time of our bulk opt-in) it matters whether the transitional items are amended measures or Schengen building measures.
I have absolutely no idea what any of that means. The EU negotiations are now so beyond any normal person's ability to understand that 99.9 per cent of the electorate is disenfranchised.
David Miliband held his own in the argument as far as I could tell, but I couldn't tell very far. He was given a couple of jolly good smacks. The chairman instructed him not to tell jokes that he'd just been telling the Foreign Affairs Committee (that stung). And Bill Cash said: "I know you've only been in the job a short while, but I find your judgement extremely faulty." That stung, too.
Here's what I could understand. The whole process leading up to this final negotiation has been characterised by a lack of candour. The discussions leading to the Mandate took place in secret (this from Michael Connarty, the Europhile chairman), texts and documents have been produced always at the last minute. "The process could not have been designed better to marginalise the role of national parliaments."
That's certainly true.
Has a fundamental constitutional change taken place? No, Miliband says. Yes, Cash says. All of Pillar 3 is being done away with. Is that a constitutional change? Not at all.
At this point, Connarty mentioned in his mild way that he had visions of "peace in our times". Connarty went on: "These are bullying clauses, and I am shocked you try to defend them. A lot of countries are implying that Britain is contaminating the negotiating process and are bringing in clauses to cajole us or pressure us..."
Miliband produced an entirely new mood. He was cut to the quick. To imply that he and Gordon Brown had made a deal with Adolf Hitler... "Maybe I'm sensitive for personal reasons." He is claiming some sort of emotional property rights in the Holocaust. This is an error of taste and judgement. Connarty's point was merely that Miliband didn't know what the future held and didn't know that he didn't know. At least that's a delusion we ignorant plebs don't suffer from.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments