The Sketch: An ambitious effort, but Tory leader could do with a kitten

If the main shareholder can't make a kitten out of a fatcat, how will the little-interested ones?

Simon Carr
Friday 20 January 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A new capitalism. A responsible capitalism. Capitalism with a free kitten. To be fair, I thought Cameron would have more free kittens in his speech on building a new economy. That's what popular political discourse requires even when discussing something as vast, as unknowable as the market.

His most recent prouncement on the economy had been at PMQs – "The Government takes absolute responsibility for everything that happens in our economy," (not even Stalin was that ambitious) so who could predict what we were going to get?

While it was a distinctly Conservative speech (Ed Miliband wouldn't have made it) there was nothing in it Miliband would violently disagree with either. Hard to know who's following whom.

One trick of opposition is to discern what the Government is going to do and then demand they do it. George Osborne used to do this to Gordon Brown. The trick of government is to watch the opposition behind and (to use a yacht racing metaphor) tack as and when they tack. It might not increase your speed but you don't get overtaken.

So Cameron, as a prudent leader, said the least he needed to keep ahead. The sacred words of capitalism – "private property" and "profit" and "short sellers" – weren't uttered because there wasn't the need to.

Top people's pay is the old "agency problem" Keynes was talking about nearly a century ago. The managers loot the company because the owners are absent. It's an extraordinarily stubborn problem because even when the owner of the Royal Bank of Scotland is – so to speak – the Prime Minister, he still can't seem to stop the chief manager getting a million-quid bonus.

If the main shareholder – who has a proper public incentive – can't make a kitten out of a fat cat, how will the dispersed, and often little interested, shareholders? Still, he might yet strip Fred Goodwin of his knighthood. But that's not fair or responsible. No, strip him of his fabulous pension, his houses, his cars, his trout streams and put him in a council house on the ringroad. That's what "responsibility" means.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in