Simon Carr: Cameron the leader who's magnanimous in accepting a moral victory
Sketch: Miliband looked like an art student sitting through a double maths period
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.We're flying in £15bn worth of banknotes for them, they're getting a written constitution, their rubbish collection works and even the Labour leader can only call for "a broad-based process of inclusive reconciliation" over there in Libya.
No wonder David Cameron was so cheerful, his first war has ended jolly well – touch and go though it was more than once. The cynics have been defeated, crushed, routed utterly. And yet even they – we – were magnanimously treated by the Prime Minister. No inclusive truth and reconciliation for us; he's very good at winning.
In a strangely lifeless Parliament, Cameron told us why we'd gone to the trouble and expense of helping Libya overthrow a murdering, torturing enemy of Britain. We couldn't risk a "failed state on our borders", he said. We "didn't want an Iraq but we didn't want a Bosnia either". We had "a moral obligation" and we had the resources as well, so "when 'ought' and 'can' come together there's a good case for action".
Not that he was propounding a new doctrine, he cautioned us. He didn't like doctrines as he was "a practical, liberal Conservative" and his only doctrine was to do practical, liberal-conservative things. That may include flogging looters as time goes on.
The Labour leader looked like an art student sitting through a double maths period. He was SOOO BORED. From time to time he cradled his forehead in his hand and ran his fingers through his – possibly gelled – hair. He may have had some perfectly sensible things to say but when he spoke his front bench went off into a collective dream world. As indeed did everyone else.
Cameron declined to make a party issue out of our previous regime's toe-sucking familiarity with Libya's previous regime. Ed Miliband chuckled at this. Of course he did, one of the principal villains in those particular villainies was Ed's mortal enemy: his brother David, who was the Foreign Secretary at the time.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments