Sergei Tudela: A shameful, greedy decision – but the fight is not over yet

Friday 19 March 2010 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Today, governments taking part in the world's largest wildlife trade convention put politics before science, and we all lost out.

A ban on the trade of bluefin tuna would have given this critically endangered fish a chance to recover. Instead, member governments of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (Cites) rejected the proposal. In doing so, they argued that managing fish populations should be a regional responsibility, instead of falling to them. But the regional fisheries management organisation in change of this fishery– the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (Iccat) – has already had plenty of opportunity to manage the fish stocks.

Instead Iccat members have continued to ignore recommendations from their own scientists, bowed to industry interests, and failed to give the Atlantic bluefin tuna the proper level of protection it requires.

WWF, which has worked on Atlantic bluefin tuna conservation for years, sees this as a major conservation setback – a shocking, ugly and scandalous outcome, dominated by greed. But the fight to save the Atlantic bluefin tuna is not over.

There are important steps that can be taken. As a matter of urgency the hi-tech industrial vessels that are emptying the Atlantic and Mediterranean of bluefin tuna – the purse seiners – should be entirely banned.

Monaco – the Cites member country that submitted the proposal for a Cites Appendix I listing of the species – last year became the first country in the world to be entirely bluefin tuna free. WWF is now actively urging other countries to follow suit.

Nor should the responsibility be confined to governments. Restaurants, retailers, chefs and consumers around the world should act too, and stop selling, serving, buying and eating this endangered species.

Our politicians have once again failed to stop the consumption of bluefin tuna. It is now more important than ever for the rest of us to take responsibility.

Sergei Tudela is Head of Fisheries at WWF Mediterranean

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in