Richard Bentall: Psychiatry's poor record of success

From a lecture by the professor of experimental clinical psychology at Manchester University

Monday 24 November 2003 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It is difficult to view the history of psychiatry with any sense of ease. Whereas the history of physical medicine is littered with clinical and scientific breakthroughs, psychiatric medicine has few achievements to boast about.

At times psychiatrists have advocated treatments that can fairly be described as cruel and barbaric. Of course, when reminded of these dreadful episodes, most doctors will retort that we live in better times. They will say that modern psychiatry is practised with due concern for the patient's distress, and with the specific aim of returning the patient to a happy, productive life.

None the less, when we look at the practice of psychiatry today, we find that, in the case of the most severe mental illnesses at least, the outcomes obtained are little, if at all, better than those obtained at the end of the 19th century. Astonishingly, cross-cultural comparisons show that patients in the developing world do rather better than those in the industrialised nations, and have a greater chance of recovering from their difficulties.

The discovery that many people live relatively happy lives despite their psychotic experiences raises the possibility that some patients may do best without any treatment. Marius Romme, a Dutch social psychiatrist, has formed a national organisation for people in Holland who hear voices, many of whom live productive lives without clinical intervention. When I met Marius on a trip to Maastricht some years ago, he told me that he liked my research into hallucinations, but that he thought that "voice-hearers" were really like homosexuals in the 1950s, and were more in need of liberation than cure. Now that is a radical thought!

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in