Peter O’Toole: much more than ‘Lawrence Of Arabia’

 

Geoffrey Macnab
Sunday 15 December 2013 22:00 GMT
Comments
Peter O'Toole died aged 81 in London December 14, 2013 after a long illness
Peter O'Toole died aged 81 in London December 14, 2013 after a long illness (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Peter O’Toole was far from the first choice to play T.E. Lawrence, but gave a searing and utterly startling performance in David Lean’s 1962 epic.

He was equally effective in portraying Lawrence as a golden-haired warrior king and in showing him as an eccentric intellectual who chafed against military discipline and had a strange, masochistic quality about him.

More than 50 years on, Lawrence Of Arabia still defines O’Toole’s movie career. Nothing he did subsequently matched the raw voltage of that performance. That’s not to say the rest of his career was insignificant. There were many Oscar nominations and many scene-stealing turns.

O’Toole was never dull in front of the camera. He rarely played minor characters or self-effacing types but was far more likely to be the roaring drunk (My Favorite Year) or the mercurial king (Becket, A Lion In Winter).

What distinguished him from his contemporaries was the ease with which he straddled two very different traditions. He possessed the authority of the Donald Wolfit actor-manager type, and the aggressive and subversive qualities of a new generation of “angry” actors like Albert Finney and Richard Harris.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in