Paul Judge: UK sacrifices in Afghanistan should be brought in line with others'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.We all salute the courage and discipline of our troops in Afghanistan. They are doing their duty with professionalism as part of Nato's campaign. However our politicians in London, enjoying their feather-bedded existence and expenses, increasingly look like First World War generals in the comfort of a chateau while sending soldiers to their deaths.
Nato is the cornerstone of our defence and the UK should play its full part. That does not, however, mean that we should provide a disproportionate share of its resources.
The Jury Team political party has analysed the latest information from ISAF, the Nato Afghanistan military command. This shows that we are providing three times more troops per head of population than our European Nato allies. The UK with 9,500 troops ,has 154 soldiers per million of population. In contrast France, Germany and Italy have a ratio of only 58, 54 and 52 per million respectively, and Spain, Portugal and Greece only have 23, 10 and 1 per million. We also have more than the US, which has 152 per million.
The position on fatalities is even more agonising. Relative to our size we have had over 12 times more deaths than our European Nato allies. In 2006 the army was redeployed to Afghanistan and John Reid, the Defence Secretary at the time, famously said that "our boys" might leave in three years "without a shot being fired". During 2006-9, Britain suffered 240 troops killed from its 61 million population. In the same period all other European Nato countries combined have only had 169 deaths from a total population of 495 million.
The Jury Team believes our policy should be to limit the number of British troops sent to Afghanistan to the average number sent by other Nato countries (relative to their population). Our polling through YouGov shows that 67 per cent of the electorate agree with this proposal and only 14 per cent disagree. Its implementation would reduce our troop numbers from 9,500 to around 4,000, a difference of only 7 per cent of total Nato forces deployed.
More British lives will be lost unnecessarily until our current Westminster leaders stop politicising war and overstretching their loyal military.
Sir Paul Judge is leader of the Jury Team: www.juryteam.org.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments