Oliver Wright: This has potential to erode democratic transparency

A company attempting to change Europe's laws might decide it did not want to be directly associated with the campaign

Oliver Wright
Tuesday 10 April 2012 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It was designed as a way of reconnecting Europe's citizens with its law-makers. But within days of the Citizens' Initiative coming into force it appears not to be the people of the Europe looking to take advantage of opportunity but corporate lobbyists.

Under the militaristic headline "A new tool in your public affairs armoury" Bell Pottinger's Brussels arm suggests the law could be an "exciting opportunity for businesses and campaign groups to directly influence EU policy".

It then offers to provide "professional support" guiding clients through the process of "devising and managing an initiative".

This is not only against the letter of the new initiative but also its spirit. And it has the potential to erode democratic transparency.

A campaign group or company attempting to change Europe's laws might well decide that it did not want to be directly associated with orchestrating such a campaign – and that is where a lobbyist could come in very useful.

They could run the campaign on behalf of a group which would blur the vested interests.

While it is fair to say that collecting a million signatures from at least seven EU countries is a formidable task – for even the most well-organised and well-funded lobbyists – there is a principle at stake.

The EU already has a problem with transparency. The fear is that unless officials move quickly to clamp down on this new "opportunity" for lobbyists, the EU's Citizens' Initiative could merely exacerbate it.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in