Oliver Wright: Part of the historical record – and a tourist attraction

Comment

Saturday 06 August 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Some years ago I did a stint reporting in Northern Ireland. I recall spending the night in a house in south-west Belfast with a rather ugly mural of King Billy on the wall.

This wasn't a part of the city known for its sectarianism – but the owners (certainly not loyalists) made it clear that they didn't have a choice about its presence. It just wasn't something you questioned.

So now, in the new Northern Ireland, has the time come to rid the country of sectarian murals altogether? I'm not so sure.

Just like the republican rebel songs whose lyrics would cause offence to some people in England, the murals are an important part of Irish history on both sides.

From the haunting portraits of the 1981 hunger strikers to the graphic image of a soldier smashing down a door in Bogside – they serve to remind people how much better life has got.

And curiously they are also helping the economy. Tourists to Belfast can now go on "terror tours" of which the murals are an integral attraction.

The murals should now be seen as historical rather political symbols. Not all of them are good and not all of them should be kept. But at least some should remain. How about a listing system for murals?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in