Nicky Chapman: Doctors do not always make the right diagnosis
From the crossbench peer's maiden speech in the House of Lords on the Mental Capacity Bill
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I have grave concerns about [the Mental Capacity Bill]. People are born and they die. These are the only two certainties in life. I have no doubt of the good intentions around the introduction of this Bill, but we must not lose the basic premise of a right to live in order to allow people the right to die.
I have grave concerns about [the Mental Capacity Bill]. People are born and they die. These are the only two certainties in life. I have no doubt of the good intentions around the introduction of this Bill, but we must not lose the basic premise of a right to live in order to allow people the right to die.
Although I can accept some of the arguments for sections of this Bill, I believe it is virtually impossible for legislation to allow this in a way that is not open to the abuse of a licence to kill.
Assessment of best interest and burden should not be medical model based and should not focus only on the negative aspects of a person's condition. A situation that appears intolerable to people who are fit and well may be more than outweighed by the positive experiences of the patient.
They have family and friends, relationships that are part of them being a rounded individual and not just a condition or impairment. I believe there is a clear line between increasing pain control medication that may hasten death, and withdrawing support, causing death. That line is the quality of life of the patient, however little life remains.
At this point, I should declare an interest. If this Bill had been passed 43 years ago, I would not be here. My parents were told I would be blind, deaf, unable to communicate and have no noticeable mental function. Doctors and practitioners do get it wrong.
We need to ensure people have the opportunity to prove the medics wrong. Although protected from this Bill as a child, there have been two or three occasions after childhood where, from a purely medical perspective, treatment could have been withdrawn from me.
This Bill ignores the fact people have a basic right to live, and this issue cannot and must not be ignored. As it stands, this Bill does not keep people safe.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments