Navnit Dholakia: Freedom of speech requires responsibility
From a speech by the President of the Liberal Democrats, in the House of Lords
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.On Saturday we celebrate Christmas; last month we celebrated the festivals of Eid and of Diwali. In September 1965, the Labour government proclaimed that Britain was a multiracial society. The United Kingdom is a multiracial, multicultural and multireligious society. The enlightened attitude of many people in our society who cele- brated this event confirms that.
On Saturday we celebrate Christmas; last month we celebrated the festivals of Eid and of Diwali. In September 1965, the Labour government proclaimed that Britain was a multiracial society. The United Kingdom is a multiracial, multicultural and multireligious society. The enlightened attitude of many people in our society who cele- brated this event confirms that.
I shall cite three examples, all of which lead us to the belief that an enlightened attitude is important. The first relates to Salman Rushdie, the author of The Satanic Verses. The book caused deep rumbling among Muslims offended by its content, prompting protests, book burning and even riots. The second example happened last weekend. The Sikh community laid siege to a theatre with the intention of cancelling a play depicting sex abuse and murder in a Sikh temple. They were not against the play as such, but against identifying such an incident in a gurdwara, which is sacrosanct to their beliefs.
The third relates to evidence given to the Home Affairs Select Committee on 14 December. A statement was made by Mr Jagdeesh Singh against the Swaminarayan Hindu mission alleging that the Neasden temple had become a base for the terrorist activities of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad. It is the most majestic temple whose principal belief is in non-violence.
These incidents have all hurt the deepest feelings of those who practise those different religions. We often fail to understand that free speech in a libertarian society carries responsibilities with it. We cannot condemn Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs as being illiberal in a society in which racial and religious discrimination is rife and people often take shelter within their religious structure. We need enlightened attitudes to ensure that in a democracy we do not isolate communities.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments