Natalie Haynes: Let's start by losing those property shows
The thing is...
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The thing is that whatever the BBC cuts, it will be something someone loves. Much as the sections of the press would have us believe that each open-plan office at the BBC contains one, carefully-chosen person systematically torching fivers with the most expensive matches money can buy, it isn't true.
Making television is an expensive business, and that isn't because of executive pay. You could fire the Director General tomorrow, and his annual salary would pay for three episodes of Eastenders. And if that makes Eastenders sound pricey, it works out at 3.5p per viewer, per episode. Which, for half an hour of pleasure (albeit derived from the misery of others), is market-stall cheap.
Cost-cutting proposals the BBC is considering are said to include axing the endless parade of property shows that fill its afternoon schedules. I find I could live without these quite easily – I pretty much never want to watch people whose teeth have chipped a little on their silver spoons whining about how the mansion they're looking at is a bit near a road that poor people may once have walked down in their hunt for menial labour.
And while I'm at it, all those antiques programmes can go too. These are known in my house as "the tat carousel", so convinced am I that they feature maybe 30 pieces of poisonously unattractive ceramic in total, migrating from one programme to another, being bought at a car boot sale and then sold at an auction before being dug out of someone's attic and beginning the whole sorry journey again.
If the BBC truly cared about us, they would scrap the lot and replace it with re-runs of Diagnosis Murder, Perry Mason and Columbo, like they used to before men with bouffant hair and ludicrous spectacles managed to convince some commissioner that an ornamental inkwell, grasped between the paws of a stuffed otter, made for good TV.
The BBC is also considering ending its overnight programming. Which doesn't sound too bad, until you realise they're measuring overnight from 10.35pm, which may be late-night for an eight-year-old, but isn't for most of us. Why not switch to repeats of the Learning Zone and Open University programmes after midnight instead? That way we can keep Later with Jools Holland, The Graham Norton Show and my beloved Review Show.
Natalie Haynes will be appearing on the 'Review Show' tomorrow night at 11pm
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments