Message Board: Is military tradition worth the death of a Canadian black bear?

After last week's report about plans to replace the Guards' distinctive bearskins with synthetic alternatives, animal-lovers and traditionalists logged on to comment:

Sunday 07 September 2008 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

mack

As well as getting rid of the bearskins, I would also suggest removing all military icons that represent animals or similar shapes. Our military forces ought to represent more down-to-earth, humanistic icons and uniforms.

flipped

Tradition? The Grenadiers never wore bearskins until Waterloo, prior to that they wore mitre caps. They were adopted purely to tell the beaten French that our foreskins were bigger than theirs. There's no reason why we couldn't revert to the mitre.

Pete

British soldiers are dying in Afghanistan because of lousy equipment and a government minister is worried about the black bear, of which there is no shortage. The furore typifies this inept, corrupt government, and its bleeding-hearted supporters.

OverrunByBears

I live just outside Toronto in Canada. We are being overrun by bears. It is necessary to control the population by hunting for public safety reasons. Might as well find a good use for their skins.

Leo Jones

I want to know if black bears are endangered in Canada. And if indigenous forest tribes are supported by selling the bear skins they hunt? If we stopped buying the skins, would they chop down the forests to sell wood, killing the bears anyway?

FauxChapeau

New hats for guardsmen will help show that Britain is not a blind slave to tradition, but is a modern, forward-thinking nation. It's imperative that we re-evaluate traditions like this to see if they make sense in today's world. Bearskin hats do not.

Kip of Canada

As a Canadian, I can tell you there is NO shortage of black bears in this country. Your guardsmen could have not only bear hats but also shorts, boots and seat covers.

Gordon Marshall

As an ex-guardsman, I would not have an issue if the bearskins were to be made from a synthetic material. However, leave the design alone. They have been like this for nearly 200 years and do not need changing.

Laura

Just because something is "tradition" doesn't make it morally right or acceptable. Animals are not ours to wear – a fact that should be obvious to most people, although clearly it isn't.

To have your say on this or any other issue visit www.independent.co.uk/IoSblogs

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in