Where was the tongue-tied Texan? This was fluent and funny

Mary Dejevsky
Thursday 20 November 2003 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

For a President who made his reputation as a tongue-tied buffoon with a fine line in malapropisms, this was a bravura performance. Whoever has been coaching George Bush in oratory deserves the Presidential Medal of Freedom (and a congratulatory glass of champagne). Speaking - yes, speaking with fluency and considerable style - at the Banqueting Hall in London yesterday, Mr Bush must surely have slain his line-fluffing demons once and for all.

This was the keynote speech of his state visit. It was a serious speech on foreign policy, at a serious time in Anglo-American relations, and he delivered it with due gravitas. But also with the full authority of his office and not a few excursions into wry humour that bespoke the greater comfort he now clearly feels when speaking in public.

The writer, or writers, deserve bouquets, too, for a 45-minute oration that switched easily between registers and avoided the two sets of clichés that we Europeans find hardest to stomach - the gun-toting ultimatums of the Wild West and the God-toting crusading of the Bible Belt - while still preserving Mr Bush's penchant for telling it "like it is".

The President set out several arguments, most of them defensive, which was not a bad tactic given the doubts even some of this country's most devoted Atlanticists still harbour about the war in Iraq. He defended the commitment of the US, and specifically his administration, to international institutions (by which he meant, primarily, the United Nations). Message: whatever you think, I am not a unilateralist, really I'm not.

He defended the use of "measured" force against Iraq, as the last and only resort in the ongoing battle against weapons proliferation and terrorism. Message: I am not an irresponsible Texan who rushes to war. And he propounded the expansion of democracy around the world - arguing that the spread of democracy would provide the US with a cordon sanitaire against those with hostile, anti-American intent. Message: the security of the US brings with it the security of its allies, chief among them, faithful old Britain.

There was much for sceptics (about either the wisdom of the war or the wisdom of George Bush) to quibble with.

The President compared what he said was the rise of international terrorism to the rise of Hitler. He said - in a parallel that Whitehall also bandies about - that the reconstruction of Iraq was happening at a quicker pace than in Germany and Japan after the Second World War (even though the scale of the human, material and ideological difficulties are of a quite different order).

But he had some enviably good lines. Of Iraq: "Free nations failed to recognise, much less confront, the aggressive evil in plain sight" and "In some cases, the measured use of force is all that protects us from a chaotic world ruled by force." It is not necessary to subscribe to the thought to appreciate the elegance of its expression. I detected only two Bushisms: the famous "nucular" (which some insist is an acceptable Texan mutation of "nuclear") and something that half-sounded like "retain" for "restrain". Otherwise, he was word-perfect.

And the flashes of humour, delivered low-key and dead-pan, with a hint - dare one say - of affection for the sometimes eccentric way we think and talk over here, seemed calculated to appeal to this very British audience. But his first gag was perhaps his best. Mr Bush opened by alluding to the most recent American notable to grace our shores, who was confined to a plastic box above the Thames.

There were those, Mr Bush acknowledged, who would have liked to confine him to similar quarters. Thankfully, the Queen had intervened ...

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in