Marjorie Wallace: How the law fails those who harm themselves

Tuesday 05 July 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

About 170,000 people a year - most of them teenagers and young adults - are seeking hospital treatment having either deliberately injured themselves or taken an overdose, but 80,000 are sent home again. There is no follow-up - such as an appointment with a psychiatrist or psychological counselling. The pain remains, they harm themselves again, are patched up and so the cycle continues.

And the more it continues, the more a person becomes addicted to self-harm as a way of relieving the pain and what started as cutting the wrists or a small overdose becomes more extreme.

It is so sad to hear of a case like Rebecca Gidney's. Why should someone who is in mental pain be criminalised for relieving that pain - albeit at the inconvenience of other people? Surely if she had been offered more treatment, a place where she could take refuge, she would not have to resort to harming herself in a public place. No one carries out an act like that unless he or she is feeling extremely disturbed or distressed and what is important is to find ways of breaking that cycle of behaviour. I do realise we cannot overburden the system trying to cope with those whose conditions are treatable. But at the same time it is not humane simply to pass the buck to the criminal justice system. A humane society should be able to respond more effectively to people who may not easily be treated but who need help.

The writer is the chief executive of the mental health charity Sane

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in