John Wadham: Security or freedom – take your pick
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In the aftermath of last week's events, both politicians and public may well demand drastic measures against the insidious dangers of the new breed of international terrorism. That means there will be growing demands for technology to help us to monitor people around us. That means more CCTV, more passport checks and more demands for identification papers.
In Britain we have got used to more of these security measures than other countries. The extra measures being contemplated in America at the moment, such as tighter airport security and increased CCTV surveillance, are already in place here.
But it is possible that in Britain, too, we will see the tightening up of security yet again – and that will inevitably have repercussions for civil liberties. The predictable calls for identity cards is a case in point. To ensure that police could track a person's whereabouts we would all be obliged to carry cards. Random stops to demand the card would need to be the norm to have any chance of finding a person without one.
However sophisticated the cards, there is every likelihood that more organised groups of terrorists will try to find ways to copy and steal cards in order to create false identities. So the pressure is on to produce the foolproof card. This is particularly the case for passports, using new facial-recognition technology.
The result of all this may well be that we all feel safer. But we will also lose anonymity and privacy. When the Prevention of Terrorism Act was passed in 1974 it was supposed to last for six months. Last year it was put on a permanent footing. Too often a government's easiest answer to demands to do something is to abolish some ancient right in order to show the voters that something is indeed being done.
John Wadham is director of Liberty. Additional research by Heather Tomlinson
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments