John Rentoul: PM's religion is a key force in his life
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tony Blair's religion has long been one of the most straightforward and yet least understood aspects of his character. Such is the suspicion of religiosity among the liberal intelligentsia that it has been one of the sub-themes of criticism of him, especially over the Iraq war.
That suspicion lay behind Jeremy Paxman's question about whether Mr Blair and President Bush had prayed together in the approach to war.
The Prime Minister is buffeted between stereotypes: that American Christians are fanatically right wing and British Christians are pacifists. Neither caricature can be applied to Mr Blair, but religion has often been used to suggest that his values are somehow different from most people's, or that he is driven by a hidden religious calling.
In his early days in office, it was suggested that, because he was married to a Roman Catholic, he had secret Papist tendencies. The implication was that this explained why he was such a conservative on social issues.
The flaw in this reasoning is that Cherie has always been a liberal, left-wing Catholic. She is in favour of women priests and disagrees with the Vatican on contraception. On the subject of his belief, it is much simpler to take her husband at his word.
He is an ecumenical Anglican who dislikes setting boundaries between denominations and faiths. He says his belief in God became "practical rather than theological" when he was a student, and that "my Christianity and my politics came together at the same time". It is, therefore, never necessary to use religious language to describe his motives or to judge his actions.
But because he is a believer, he does sometimes use such language himself. He wanted to end his television address to the nation announcing his decision to send British forces into Iraq with the words "God bless you", but was prevailed upon by his advisers to end with "Thank you".
Peter Stothard, a former editor of The Times, who was a semi-official chronicler of this period, recorded the brief theological debate. Mr Blair complained: "You are the most ungodly lot I have ever ..." To which Peter Hyman, his speechwriter, who is Jewish, said: "Ungodly? Count me out." Someone else said: "That's not the same God." To which Blair replied fiercely: "It is the same God."
Two weeks later, with the invasion heading towards its conclusion, he told Mr Stothard in the Cabinet Room that he was ready "to meet my maker" and answer for "those who have died or have been horribly maimed as a result of my decisions".
Just as in his interview with Michael Parkinson, the language of God's judgement is a religious person's way of saying that the ultimate assessment of the right or wrong of his actions will not be for him to make. Non-believers would ascribe such a judgement to the collective wisdom of the people, or historians, or posterity. Believers, unless they are literalist fundamentalists, and Blair is not one of those, use a different formulation to express precisely the same idea.
The writer is a biographer of Tony Blair
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments