Jeremy Laurance: This is a misuse of the law

Friday 27 May 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Daniel James is not the only British person with a non-terminal illness to have ended his life at Dignitas, but he is the youngest. That makes his case especially challenging for Lord Falconer's review which seeks to bring order to a confused area of public policy.

Dignity in Dying, which helped establish the review, part-funded by the best-selling author and Alzheimer's sufferer Terry Pratchett, campaigns for a change in the law to allow people with a terminal illness to be helped to die in the UK, so they are not forced to travel abroad.

But even in cases that are not terminal, people who act compassionately should not have to go through the trauma of a serious crime police investigation. In 2009 the conductor Sir Edward Downes, 85, chose to end his life at Dignitas with his wife Joan, 74, who had terminal cancer. He did not have a terminal condition but with deteriorating eyesight, hearing and mobility could not bear to go on without her.

A family friend who helped them was on bail for 10 months while waiting to learn if she would be prosecuted. That is cruel and unusual treatment and a misuse of the law.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in