Ian Burrell: 'Son of PCC' may not be enough to clean up Fleet Street

 

Ian Burrell
Wednesday 11 January 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

So how effective might it be, this new press watchdog, this "Son of PCC" as William Lewis, the former editor of The Daily Telegraph, was anxious to name it?

Certainly there is a will – expressed by various senior Fleet Street figures yesterday – to give a successor body to the Press Complaints Commission a host of powers which might ensure something positive comes out of the shameful phone-hacking affair. That might mean the power to impose fines or issue kitemarks which show a publisher is committed to a set of standards. Lewis himself advocated that a new body might have the right to exclude non-signatories from the official circulation figures, the "currency" that news organisations use to justify advertising rates.

Lord Justice Leveson did not seem convinced but it was clear he was anxious to hear Fleet Street's thoughts on how it might clean up its gutters. After listening to the tawdry evidence of phone hacking and other press malfeasance, the judge is looking to the future. "I'm very keen that the industry has some ideas provided the industry accepts that they have got to work not only for the industry but for me," he said, adding, "by me – I mean the general public."

As he shot the breeze with the likes of Financial Times editor Lionel Barber and Telegraph Media Group chief executive Murdoch MacLennan, he thought aloud of a new watchdog with an arbitration arm that could speedily and inexpensively rule on disputes.

Perhaps some critics of the British press might be disappointed by Leveson's appetite for a dialogue. The inquiry drew criticism for the failure to interrogate The Sun more thoroughly over such matters as the Hillsborough disaster. But although Lord Justice Leveson said he "understood" why newspapers were afraid of state regulation and acknowledged the disadvantages the press faced in comparison to unregulated online publishers, he signalled he will not be happy with anything less than radical reform of press regulation. "I'm not going to call it the Son of PCC," he told Lewis, "because that suggests a little tinkering will do."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in