Ian Burrell: A bold attempt to win some friends in influential places
Analysis
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Giving last year's MacTaggart lecture, James Murdoch's barely hidden agenda was to highlight the threat posed by the BBC to News Corporation's interests, most pressingly its plans to charge for online content from its newspapers, endangered by the strength of the BBC's free online news service.
The attack was well received by other commercial media organisations.
While Mr Murdoch sought to give the impression that BSkyB was a small player in the British broadcasting ecology, it is anything but.
In contrast, Mark Thompson's lecture yesterday was intended to take pressure off the BBC – which is facing calls from politicians and commercial rivals to reduce the scale of its ambitions – by highlighting the growth of BSkyB.
Although the BBC was anxious to portray the speech as one that was intended to protect the creative future of the British television industry, it will be seen as an attack on BSkyB and the power of News Corporation.
In cheekily challenging BSkyB to make a financial commitment to the commercially funded British public service broadcasters (ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5), Mr Thompson was suggesting that his concerns were for British television in general, not just the BBC, which would not receive money under this scenario.
The director-general's strategy here was to win the BBC some friends in commercial media, portraying the satellite giant, and not the corporation, as the cash-rich behemoth that the industry should be wary of.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments