George Osborne: A taxation policy does not equal an economic policy

From a speech by the shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, delivered to the Centre for Policy Studies, in London

Thursday 14 July 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

That we don't see such political cartoons in the papers today reminds us that it is as true now as it was then: without a strong and stable economy, the social policies of politicians are worthless. A strong society depends on a strong economy.

For far too long the Conservative Party has had good ideas, but lacked consistency and clarity. We have correctly put forward the case for lower taxes, but failed to set that in the context of a broader economic strategy. A taxation policy does not equal an economic policy. We need to show how lower taxes support our wider economic objectives.

We laid the foundation for the macroeconomic stability that Britain has enjoyed, but we lost credit for it by voting against Bank independence. We have talked about reform of public services, but we opposed foundation hospitals. It's good news that we are now supporting City Academies.

We have made theoretical arguments in favour of a smaller state, but in practice we voted against tuition fees. We have consistently opposed strikes yet tacitly supported the fuel protesters who brought England to a virtual stand still.

Too often we have sacrificed long-term credibility for the prospect of winning the support of an aggrieved section of the population or the possibility of winning a vote in the House of Commons. By disagreeing with the Prime Minister when he attempts to do the right thing, we undermine our credibility when we criticise him for doing the wrong thing.

Short-termism has hampered attempts to develop a long term economic policy.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in