Friends and family could be just another box-ticking exercise
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The friends-and-family test is intended to provide guidance for patients' loved ones, helping them choose the best hospital should they need an operation at a later date, for instance.
Based on the customer satisfaction survey known as the Net Promoter Score, used by companies including Apple, Virgin and British Airways, patients will use it from next April. Its detractors point out that a recommendation from a friend is no guarantee of good care. Harold Shipman, the serial murderer, was highly popular with his patients
According to national guidance from the Department of Health, patients will be asked: "How likely are you to recommend our ward/A&E department to friends and family if they needed similar care?"
The answers will be scored out of 10 ranging from "extremely likely" to extremely unlikely, with patients able to add comments. NHS Trusts with good scores will be financially rewarded.
Toby Knightley-Day, managing director of Fr3dom Health, who helped develop the test for the NHS, warned that it must be seen as more than just a score, and trusts must focus on the cultural and behavioural changes needed to drive it up.
But critics say the test will distract trusts from their main purpose and become another box-ticking exercise, adding to their bureaucratic burden.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments