Even the City wouldn't tolerate the Director-General's £450,000 pay-off
Few City chairmen would resort to the L’Oréal defence any more: because he’s worth it
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There was a time when the £450,000 pay-off that George Entwistle received – £225,000 over and above his contractual entitlement – would not have stirred the anger of City investors should the BBC have been a stock market-listed company.
After all, fund managers are used to seeing executives carry large sums out of the door. Remember the former Royal Bank of Scotland boss Fred Goodwin received as much as that £225,000 in just eight months of drawing his (reduced) pension.
But times have changed.
Middling stock market returns prompted the shareholder spring in which overpaid, underperforming bosses were ousted from a string of big companies this year. The value-for-money mood is here to stay. Some of those chiefs caused a stir for merely trying to carry off salary and bonuses to which they were contractually entitled. More fool investors for signing off on those packages in the first place.
However, discretionary payments have been raising hackles for years.
Few City chairmen would resort to the L'Oréal defence any more: because he's worth it. Grandees such as Lord Patten must understand that just doesn't wash any more, particularly when the company that Entwistle leaves behind has seen its metaphoric share price collapse so spectacularly.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments