Edward Davey MP: Winning liberties

From a speech by the Lib Dem Treasury spokesman, at the Royal Society of Arts

Tuesday 20 August 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It's time to be asking questions about the future of the state. We can move the focus away from how a service is paid for towards how the service is provided and how we get the best quality service.

It's not just about cash. If we can free public services from political, centralised interference, then through those freedoms we can get better service. Public services and the public sector need more challenging liberties. Rather than having to win them from Whitehall, they need to win them from the community they serve.

Mutuals have already been running public services in Britain and abroad in many ways and shapes and sizes. Often they can provide community involvement, employee participation, and a much greater dedication to the service, so I think we should be experimenting more with them.

We should map out ways of how existing providers, both public sector and private sector, could be transformed into mutuals. These mutuals would take the bulk of their revenues from taxpayers under a contract, but they would have much greater freedoms. They'd need a new legal identity, one idea being what I'm calling a public-benefit corporation. That would have financial freedom as it would be based under company law, but assets could only be transferred to another public-benefit corporation, preventing any carpetbagger problem.

You could see NHS trusts or colleges transferring to public-benefit corporation status but only – and this is key – if they have local agreement. It shouldn't be done through Whitehall fiat because mutualisation, if it's to work, has to be bottom-up, not top-down.

We want a pluralist model of a decentralised state, where the civil service is reformed and is at the cutting edge of making the deals, and has the option not just of going down the public or private route but going down the mutual route.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in