Dr Laurence Buckman: Why I'm against the new scheme
Chairman of GP Committee, British Medical Association
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The reality of polyclinics is that they have the potential to undermine proven ways of delivering quality patient care.
There may be a case for establishing a polyclinic in specific areas where local patients and clinicians agree – this is not what is happening. Across England, primary care trusts are planning to roll out polyclinics with little thought to the effect this will have on the local health service.
Older and vulnerable patients who rely on public transport could face arduous journeys to see their doctor. There is also concern that large polyclinics will depersonalise the relationship between doctor and patient.
Communications from central government to strategic health authorities make it clear that the contracts for these polyclinics are likely to be APMS contracts (Alternative Providers of Medical Services), which is the route under which private companies would provide general practice care. This commercialisation is the opposite of the personalised care which the Government espouses and which family doctors already provide.
The 'one size fits all' approach to delivering health care will not work. What works in London is unlikely to suit the needs of a rural community.
Practical and resource issues need to be resolved, and the BMA is anxious that we start productive discussions as soon as possible.
To have your say on this or any other issue visit www.independent.co.uk/IoSblogs
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments