Don’t let the nimby drivers deflate cycling
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Surrey residents’ objection to cycle races is yet another depressing reminder that the two-wheeled revolution that has swept the UK is by no means universally welcomed.
It’s the assumption behind the protest that needs to be questioned: that roads are for cars, that they “belong” to the people who live nearest to them, and that cyclists are an intrusion.
It’s hard not to see this as an attack on cyclists generally. One Surrey protester was quoted by the BBC as saying that cyclists “practise months in advance of the event, riding the route in very large numbers from very early in the morning shouting at each other” – absurd claims all of them. As someone who frequently rides out to Surrey from London, I can vouch that the presence of cyclists is negligible compared with the number of cars.
It may be time for pro races that want to visit London to explore other routes out of the city. Surrey’s hills are what provide the appeal, but there are hills in Kent, too. By all means let’s spread the races around a bit – but for variety’s sake, not to appease the nimby car lobby.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments