Dominique de Villepin: A pre-emptive strike that has hit democracy
From the Alastair Buchan Memorial Lecture by the French Foreign Minister, given at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, in London
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The military operation in Kosovo was a legitimate enterprise and a political success. But it was also a source of divisions. Some saw it as the first instance of a right to intervene on humanitarian grounds without a UN mandate. We, however, saw it as an exception, justified by a large support and the threat of humanitarian disaster.
Through the Iraqi crisis, two different understandings of the world are coming head to head. According to one such understanding, developed in US think-tanks, democracy can be imposed from the outside. Having faith in the power of the law is therefore something of a delusion. International legal tools become constraints more than safeguards of international security. Some even say that the US would assume its responsibilities alone and show its strength while Europe's position reflects its weakness.
It also means that some governments might decide of their own accord to strike first given the scope of a threat. Self-defence then knows no bounds. But the limits of the use of force in Iraq and unclear political prospects for the country fuel many questions on the relevance of such an analysis.
We believe in democracy, just as the British and Americans do. With the Magna Carta, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the US constitution, our countries headed the democratic revolution. We do not oppose the use of force. We are only warning against the risks of pre-emptive strikes as a doctrine. What example are we setting for other countries? How legitimate would we feel such action to be?.
In endorsing this doctrine, we risk introducing the principle of constant instability and uncertainty. Do not let us open a Pandora's box.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments