David Miliband: Why students are getting better and better at exams
From a speech at Imperial College, London, by the Minister of State for School Standards
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One myth about education is that, because there is an unchanging distribution and level of intelligence and aptitude, there should, therefore, be an unchanging distribution and level of educational achievement. This deep-seated myth relies on two confusions.
One myth about education is that, because there is an unchanging distribution and level of intelligence and aptitude, there should, therefore, be an unchanging distribution and level of educational achievement. This deep-seated myth relies on two confusions.
The first is between different types of intelligence. It is a truism that different people are good at different things. And because different people are good at different things, it is silly to rely on a single metric of aptitude in measuring achievement. Increasingly, our tests and exams are focusing on a broader range of intellectual competence than was traditionally measured by conventional IQ tests. For example, students are asked to apply knowledge as well as recall it. The result is that more of our youngsters are able to show what they are capable of.
There is also the confusion between intelligence or aptitude, and achievement. Whatever your potential, it is its realisation that is the vital task of education. And education systems can be more or less successful at fulfilling potential. So even with a given distribution of aptitudes, there is plenty of scope for education to become more successful at realising potential.
For example, there are now an increasing range of teaching strategies that can substantially accelerate rates of learning and help students acquire a broader range of independent learning skills. My contention is not that today's students are born cleverer than their parents; it is that schools and teachers are getting better at getting the best out of them.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments