Colonel Stuart Tootal: Brown is responsible for underfunding of troops

Friday 05 March 2010 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

As one of those who participated in the invasion of Iraq in 2003, I would expect some pretty tough questioning of Gordon Brown at today's inquiry into the conflict with regard to the provisioning of our armed forces.

As the Chancellor, the now Prime Minister was ultimately responsible for the significant underfunding of the military at a time when we were deploying for war. The prospect of conflict in Iraq was known about months in advance, but much of the kit that we needed only reached us just before we crossed the desert border leaving us little time to train with it. Some never arrived at all and some of it, such as the Snatch Land Rovers we were forced to use, was very obviously sub-optimal.

It is true that the equipment situation in Afghanistan, in terms of weapons systems, better armoured vehicles and soldiers' individual kit has improved. But the consequence of a decade of underfunding is still all too readily apparent in other critical areas, such as helicopters; an area of deficiency identified in the Strategic Defence Review of 1998, but never made good despite the repeated demands of commanders; most notably in 2006 when UK troops first entered Helmand.

The Prime Minister must be pressed on why this was allowed to happen. Additionally, he must be asked if he agrees that the present procurement system still needs to be sharper and more responsive to meet the requests of commanders on the ground to ensure they get the kit, in the right quantities, when they ask for it both before and during operations.

Finally, he must be asked, if he remains in power after the next election, whether he will do something to bring about much-needed reform to the procurement process and defence funding in the forthcoming, and long overdue, Strategic Defence Review.

Colonel Stuart Tootal, who served in the invasion of Iraq, went on to command the 3rd Battalion, The Parachute Regiment during the initial push into Helmand, Afghanistan, before leaving the army

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in