Civil war will break out unless local activists have the final say

Michael Brown
Thursday 31 March 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I was still a member of the Arundel Young Conservatives when I entered the Scunthorpe Conservative Club on 16 March 1976 (the day Harold Wilson resigned) for my interview to become the prospective parliamentary candidate. I was not on the party's official list. There was a frightful fracas when the Central Office boffin informed the meeting that I was not "official". Knarled local party members objected, however, to their freedom to choose me being circumscribed by outsiders. Consequently, I got more votes than anybody did else thanks to the natural desire of party members to be bloody-minded. When the locals asked whether, if elected, I would obey the party whip I promised only that I would make it a principle always to vote against the party at least once a year.

I was still a member of the Arundel Young Conservatives when I entered the Scunthorpe Conservative Club on 16 March 1976 (the day Harold Wilson resigned) for my interview to become the prospective parliamentary candidate. I was not on the party's official list. There was a frightful fracas when the Central Office boffin informed the meeting that I was not "official". Knarled local party members objected, however, to their freedom to choose me being circumscribed by outsiders. Consequently, I got more votes than anybody did else thanks to the natural desire of party members to be bloody-minded. When the locals asked whether, if elected, I would obey the party whip I promised only that I would make it a principle always to vote against the party at least once a year.

I had failed my Central Office interview a year earlier - when Edward Heath was leader - because I refused to accept the party's policy to control prices and incomes. But the seat was solidly Labour so Central Office decided to cave in - probably assuming I would never make it to Westminster. I can still remember the embarrassment of the Tory MP responsible for candidates when I walked into the Commons after winning the seat in 1979.

Any Tory MP who allows Michael Howard to get away with trying to suggest they are accountable to him and no one else is failing those who selected them and, more important, those who elected them. If Howard Flight is not allowed to put his future in the hands of those who, just five weeks ago readopted him as their candidate for Arundel and South Downs, there will be civil war not only in that association but throughout the rest of the constituency parties. Voluntary party activity will die unless they have ownership of their candidates.

This is now more than about some gaffe at a private meeting about future Tory spending policy. The outcome of this debacle threatens the very basis on which MPs are chosen locally and would alter their relationship with their constituents. In future, if an MP is expected to put his or her allegiance to a transitory party leader before their constituents then there is little point in electing MPs and no point in having local parties. Mr Howard is single-handedly destroying what is left of voluntary party activity if local party members cannot be sovereign in the choice of their nominee.

Mr Howard says it is all about "accountability" but frankly it smacks of Stalinism. He would do well to remember that, unless he becomes Prime Minister in five weeks' time, it is he who will be held accountable to Tory MPs for this mess. Meanwhile, Mr Flight should never forget that he still has it in his power, ultimately, to put himself on the ballot paper and account for his actions directly to all the voters. That was what I threatened when Margaret Thatcher's government tried to dump nuclear waste in my constituency. She soon backed off.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in