Chalk Talk with Richard Garner: These exam reforms matter – so do let's stop playing politics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Whatever else your thoughts on Education Secretary Michael Gove's plans to replace GCSEs with the EBacc, think on this. Its launch wasn't really the way a reputable government department should handle the start of a debate on what is probably the most significant reform of the education system planned in this Parliament.
It started with leaks to right-wing newspapers in a way to appeal to the Conservative right wing – thus prompting speculation it was all about the incumbent Education Secretary presenting himself as a rival to "BoJo" in a forthcoming Conservative party leadership campaign.
As a result there was a flurry of fury right across the education world as teachers, academics and opposition MPs (all useful enemies for Mr Gove in the political game being played out) reacted to what they perceived as a plan to bring back O-levels.
By the time Mr Gove got on his feet in the House of Commons and released a document about his proposals, entrenched positions had been taken up.
Which is a pity, really, because while I hate to think I am dousing Mr Gove's leadership hopes, the actual proposals were a bit more nuanced than the Daily Mail (or whoever had spun it to them) would have us believe. There was mention of the new EBacc for the first time and there was good in the plan and bad in the plan – and definitely something that merits debate.
The good in it is the revival in subjects such as modern languages, history and geography. The bad in it is the fact that no subject outside the Baccalaureate appears worthy of recognition as a qualification. If I had been at school under the current EBacc, I would probably have ended up a NEET (not in education employment or training after the age of 16), with no qualifications at all as a result of my appalling record at science.
Most versions of the Baccalaureate are broader based than this one – including subjects such as art and technology and a dissertation, for instance. Let's hope, though, that improvements can be wrought through meaningful discussions rather than the current megaphone diplomacy.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments