Antoine F. Goetschel: Legal rights for animals? It's not as crazy as it sounds
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.How fascinating – filing a lawsuit against the owners of orcas with a view to expanding anti-slavery legislations to non-human vertebrates.
From my personal point of view, I cannot imagine that the creators of the 13th Amendment to Constitution of the United States ever considered that the prohibition on slavery could ever be extended to cover animals in captivity.
But it is not the first time this sort of thing has been tried. The 'why not also them' theory was put to the test in a 1986 case that called for the freedom of German seals. This attempt, and all others as far as I know, was in vain.
But the question remains. Why should it be appropriate to keep animals, be it orcas, or chimpanzees, in captivity? Probably because of the consequences to those who keep dogs and cats, and mice for animal experiments, or cattle in conditions that deprive them of even the most basic of rights. But this is not good enough. Therefore these lawsuits have to be filed when trying to stretch protection for animals.
Better is new legislation passed in Switzerland (and South Korea) where the "dignity of creature" is now protected.
Antoine F. Goetschel is a Zurich-based animal rights lawyer
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments