Annuities remain logical choice provided they are fairly priced

 

Simon Read
Thursday 20 March 2014 21:58 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Despite bleatings from some self-serving sections of the insurance industry that Osborne’s pension plans will be disastrous, it could actually prove to be the opposite.

Handing over responsibility and choice to people is likely to encourage them to get much better outcomes for their retirement cash, rather than make them suddenly behave recklessly and blow it on holidays.

And warnings that the move is a death knell for annuities – Barclays reckons the market could shrink by two-thirds in just 18 months, for instance – are far from the mark.

Sure, in the short term the surprise proposal has been a disaster for insurers. Annuity specialist Partnership has been hardest hit, losing half its stock market value immediately after the announcement. The company’s shares took a further big battering today, slumping another 10 per cent or so. Meanwhile, the UK’s biggest insurers have seen billions wiped off their values.

But the change actually gives insurers a challenge: to turn their expensive, poor-value products into fairly priced ones with decent payouts. If they can do that then it will be logical for older people seeking an income in retirement to make a positive choice and buy an annuity.

Robin Williamson, technical director of the Low Incomes Reform Group, suggested: “The vastly more flexible rules for drawing down pensions without necessarily taking out an annuity should force providers to be more competitive in what they are prepared to offer pension savers.”

And early reaction suggests that the insurance industry is up for the challenge. “There will be an appetite to engage with the challenge of a reformed framework, and make it work, just as providers in the market will innovate to meet the demand created by the new rules,” predicted Huw Evans, deputy director general of the Association of British Insurers.

That innovation is likely to see a drift towards lifetime savings schemes, rather than specific retirement savings – a concept much easier to grasp.

Millions are already used to stashing cash in tax-free individual savings accounts instead of blowing it in an orgy of spending. When they’re given a more flexible pension they are likely to adopt the same sensible approach, not least because leaving their cash within a pension for as long as possible will allow it to grow tax-free .

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in