Anne Penketh: Brown's message was clear... his foreign policy is all about multilateralism

Tuesday 13 November 2007 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Gordon Brown has firmly nailed his multilateralist colours to the mast, by confirming he will conduct foreign policy in a different way from his predecessor Tony Blair. On every single foreign policy challenge he mentioned, the Prime Minister said Britain would act in concert with other players in support of a "hard-headed internationalism".

Mr Brown's first foreign-policy speech was short on detail and was similar to the message spelled out in Washington by his International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander in July, which troubled the White House and preceded the drawdown of British troops in Iraq. But Mr Brown stressed ties with the US "constitute our most important bilateral relationship".

Iran

He described Iran's nuclear ambitions as "the greatest immediate challenge to non-proliferation". The Bush administration and the new French government of President Nicolas Sarkozy have warned that Iran will not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon, by military force if necessary, although the preferred option remains diplomatic. Mr Brown left open the prospect of military action, saying ambiguously "Iran should be in no doubt about our seriousness of purpose." But he, too, stressed that the multilateral diplomatic route was preferable.

If Iran continues to refuse to halt uranium-enrichment, Britain would seek tougher sanctions, targeting its oil and gas sectors. But Mr Brown knows that Russia and China will not support such action at the UN. Mr Brown also offered support for a decades-old proposal for a central bank for nuclear fuel.

Pakistan

Again, Mr Brown framed the issue of how to deal with nuclear-armed Pakistan's flight from democracy as a multilateral challenge. General Musharraf has declined to specify when he will lift emergency rule, and Mr Brown did not say what should happen if the President continues to defy the rest of the world. Mr Brown did not mention possible sanctions targeting military or economic co-operation, reflecting Britain's aim of keeping President Musharraf as an ally in the US-led "war on terror".

Afghanistan/Iraq

Surprisingly, Mr Brown dealt with Afghanistan in a single sentence. But he stressed that support for economic and social development would match the military effort. In Iraq's Basra province, where British troops next month end their combat role, "we will support economic development to give the people a greater stake in the future," he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in