Andrew Martin: Against the odds, the Rolling Stones have turned into role models

 

Andrew Martin
Friday 31 August 2012 20:19 BST
Comments
The Rolling Stones in the early days
The Rolling Stones in the early days (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Those of us born in the year and month of the Rolling Stones' first gig (July 1962) tend to feel we somehow exist in a spin-off from their energy field. But surely even those not so closely tied in to their odyssey would welcome the almost-official news that they will be playing gigs in London and New York in November (this on top of rumours of a new album).

Why? Well, the Stones' story is not so much a rake's progress as a coming full circle back to the much-missed virtues of the decade of their birth, the 1940s. First: reticence.

Yes, they are "the Greatest Rock and Roll Band in the World", but they didn't call themselves that any more than Jesus Christ called himself the Son of God. Admittedly, when asked "With which historical figure do you most identify?" Keith Richards replied "Myself", but neither he nor Mick is a chat show regular, and they seldom counter negative news stories about themselves.

Also, they turned down the Olympics closing ceremony, offering the polite excuse that "we aren't quite stage ready", rather than stating the fact of the case: "It's because we have good taste."

Second: self-restraint. If invited to a good drinks party, most people in the media or arts will naturally get as drunk as possible. The Stones have been at the best possible drinks party for 50 years continuously and none of them is actually dead (except Brian Jones). Someone, incidentally, should write a revisionist account of Keith Richards, focusing not on how many drugs he has taken, but how many he has turned down.

There have always been a lot of canapés at that ongoing soirée, but the Stones are all thin. Richards recently said that he is appalled by the amount of time most Britons spend watching television. He wanted to tell almost every man he met: "Why don't you take the dog for a walk, for God's sake?"

The Stones eat sensibly and take exercise; indeed, Richards was nearly killed as a result of climbing a tree. Before that, he fell off the stepladder in his library when reaching for some commendably highbrow book. It seems Keef is doomed to die while performing one or another act of old-fashioned virtue: mown down while helping an (even) older person across the road, perhaps.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in