Andrew Grice: The PM has only himself to blame for Budget mess

Thursday 24 April 2008 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The writing was on the wall three weeks ago, but Gordon Brown refused to read it. A string of Labour MPs challenged him over his decision to abolish the 10p rate of income tax when he addressed their weekly meeting.

An irritated Prime Minister dismissed their concerns, insisting that people on low incomes would not lose out because they would be compensated through his flagship tax credit scheme. There was a loud rumble of discontent at that point. The rumblers knew otherwise after receiving complaints from their constituents.

Mr Brown was sure the number of losers from his tax shake-up was less than the 5.3 million estimated by the independent Institute for Fiscal Studies. But because people's individual circumstances vary, the Treasury could not come up with an accurate figure.

A two-week Commons recess might have taken the steam out of the growing Labour rebellion. In fact, it had the opposite effect. Many Labour members campaigned for next week's local elections and found the 10p decision was inflicting huge damage on the party.

Mr Brown, on a visit to America last week, had to fend off questions about the turmoil at home. He dismissed the row as a media frenzy, a short-term blip while he focused on the big long-term issues. But he had to interrupt his White House visit to talk a ministerial aide, Angela Smith, out of resigning.

On Monday, Mr Brown had finally grasped the scale of the problem. He adopted a conciliatory tone when he addressed his MPs again, reassuring them that he "got it". But his appeal for unity failed to quell the rebellion, forcing yesterday's spectacular climbdown.

Brown allies hope that what voters will remember is the final decision to compensate most losers rather than the messy way at which it was arrived. Yet MPs from across the Labour spectrum believe the affair raises questions about Mr Brown's judgement and even his ability to be an effective prime minister.

There was a cruel irony in Mr Brown being pilloried for hitting the poor, since they have benefited from his "redistribution by stealth" policy since 1997. But he cannot claim bad luck.

He scrapped the 10p rate to finance a headline-grabbing cut in the basic rate of tax from 22p to 20p, which he hoped would woo Middle England. It was too clever by half. Within minutes, his final Budget was dubbed a "tax con". Now he has reaped the whirlwind. And he has no one to blame but himself.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in