Will selling to Murdoch ruin Vice's credibility?
Rupert Murdoch has nothing to lose here. Only time will tell whether the Vice brand is damaged by being connected to a reactionary network like Fox News
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Given how hard News Corp is working to clean up its reputation after allegations of various forms of criminality, it seems a little reckless of Rupert Murdoch to be jumping into bed with a media company called Vice.
And for a youngish brand that has built its own name by combining street smarts with an ability to report serious global stories in a quirky and youth-friendly fashion, an alliance with the world’s most famous traditional media baron appears like marketing madness.
But £45m is no small amount of money to a business that started out as a publicly-funded community magazine in Montreal - and Vice Media has grown by striking up partnerships with bigger organisations, ranging from broadcaster HBO to the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), which is shown online by Vice and on television by Murdoch’s Fox network.
I imagine that Vice will be hoping that the publicity surrounding News Corp’s purchase of a 5 per cent shareholding will go unnoticed by most of its audience. Vice, which is predominantly a video brand these days but still produces its print magazine in 34 countries, still depends on its underground credibility even if it is now a large international player. The company is expanding into China, something that will also have impressed a Sinophile like Murdoch.
As for Rupert, he has nothing to lose here. The mogul first expressed interest in Vice Media on his Twitter account last October but denied a planned buy-up by saying – quite reasonably – that corporate backing was the “last thing they need”. But apparently the price was right for Vice. For News Corp, the outlay was mere pocket change for a business with annual revenues of $33bn – especially one that splashed $580m on MySpace way back in 2005.
I hope that the Vice chief executive Shane Smith, along with the Brits on his top team such as Tyneside-born president Andrew Creighton and its Global Editor Andy Capper, know what they’re doing. Vice has until now been a great success story and has shown the way in engaging in current affairs a generation that is supposedly less interested in the news.
Time will tell whether the Vice brand is damaged by being connected to a reactionary network like Fox News, or whether the business somehow benefits from access to the expertise and resources of the Murdoch empire.
Vice, which bought its vice.com domain name from a pornographer, has never sought the virginal reputation of a brand like Innocent – which presented itself as a clean and healthy alternative in the food and drinks market. But when I heard about Vice’s deal with Rupert Murdoch, it was the smoothie brand with the halo that instantly came to mind – and specifically when Innocent paired up with McDonald’s and Coca Cola.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments