The test is at fault, not the kids or the teachers

Richard Garner
Thursday 27 September 2012 23:05 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

No one could deny that teaching children to become fluent readers is probably the most important task a teacher has in those first years of schooling. Without the ability to read, a pupil cannot understand any other areas of the curriculum.

That having been said, serious doubts have been raised over whether the Government's new phonics test for five- and six-year-olds – with its made-up words – is the best way to do this. It is said by teachers that some of the brightest children fail it because they try to turn the made-up words into real words.

The results of the phonics test published yesterday showed a 42 per cent failure rate – compared with just 13 per cent failing to reach the required standard in the assessment of seven-year-olds. That suggests a discrepancy which either means the teachers are right in saying children who are good readers are being caught out by the phonics test or the national curriculum assessments are flawed.

One of the promises Michael Gove made when he became Education Secretary was that he would give teachers more freedom to teach. This would seem to be an example where he could allow them to carry out their own assessments of their pupils.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in