The latest revelation in a history of failures

 

Kim Sengupta
Thursday 11 October 2012 10:09 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The hearing in Washington, and the further details it provides about the security problems in Benghazi, is just the latest revelation of the intelligence failures which contributed to the murders of American ambassador Christopher Stevens and three members of his team.

The US media has charted how the Obama administration has changed its posture half dozen times since the killings. When The Independent broke the news that there was evidence to suggest that the storming of the consulate was not because of spontaneous anger over a film about the Prophet Mohammed, but a pre-planned plot, there were denials from the State Department.

The State Department also denied that there had been warnings in the past about the deteriorating situation in the Libyan city. The stance begun to crumble within days with American and Libyan officials, including the interim President, Mohammed el-Megarif, lining up to contradict the account from Washington and pointing out how information had been available about extremist groups plotting to carry out an attack.

US officials spoke of the need to keep a lid on the scandal before November to prevent Mitt Romney from using it as an electoral weapon. However the pressure generated by congressmen and senators, leaks by dis-gruntled officials and continuing accounts of journalists made that position increasingly untenable.

Ironically, what unfolded in Benghazi was a vindication of the West's support for the Libyan revolution. While crowds were attacking US and European embassies elsewhere, people in Benghazi were also out in the streets – to drive out hardline groups, in particular Ansar Al-Sharia, which had played a role in the killings of Stevens and the others. Chris Stevens was not without doubts about post-Gaddafi Libya. He was, however, firmly of the belief that Western engagement was essential to balance that of reactionary Islam, what happened in Benghazi after his death was a poignant vindication of that view.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in